WEKO3
アイテム
インド古典真理論研究の展望
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002003221
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002003221138e94f5-d37c-424e-a616-51a721b3fae4
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ioc178003.pdf (1.1 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2022-02-15 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | インド古典真理論研究の展望 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | An Overview of Primary and Secondary Sources for the Sake of the Future Study of Prāmāṇya | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/0002003221 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 |
片岡, 啓
× 片岡, 啓
|
|||||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | 九州大学大学院人文科学研究院 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The aim of this paper is to attempt a research perspective on classical Indian theories of truth/validity ( prāmānṇya). To this end, I review previous studies in three phases (early, middle, and late) and follow the progress of the studies to date. In order to clarify the structure of the problems dealt with in theories of truth, which have been discussed among Mīmāṃsakas, Buddhist logicians, and Naiyāyikas, an attempt is made to order the basic concepts such as prāptabādha, utsarga and apavāda, the opposition between utpattitaḥand jñaptitaḥ, and the main underlying assumptions. Next, in order to clarify the historical development of the post-Kumālila theories of truth, I examine the historical developments among the various theorists of Mīmāṃsā (Umbeka, Sucarita and Pārthasārathi), the Buddhist school of logic (Devendrabuddhi, Śākyabuddhi, Śāntarakṣita and Kamalaśīla), and the school of Nyāya (Jayanta). In this paper, I try to explain the process of exchange of arguments by Indian authors of different schools and to show the concrete aspects of the historical development of the arguments. By taking into account the critiques from the school of Buddhist logic, I trace the development of theory after Kumārila. This also reveals the differences of the theoretical positions adopted by Kumārila, Umbeka, Sucarita and Pārthasārathi. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 東洋文化研究所紀要 en : The memoirs of Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia 巻 178, p. 156(281)-65(372), 発行日 2021-02-28 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00170926 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
