WEKO3
アイテム
曹操の軍事思想 : 魏武註『孫子』を中心として
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002007561
https://doi.org/10.15083/000200756146bdb307-b96d-4065-917e-adaf630af26d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ioc182002.pdf (916.1 KB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-06-06 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 曹操の軍事思想 : 魏武註『孫子』を中心として | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Cao Cao’s Military Thought : With a Focus on His Commentary on the Sunzi | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/0002007561 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 |
渡邉, 義浩
× 渡邉, 義浩
|
|||||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 値 | 早稲田大学文学学術院 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | The Yinqueshan 銀雀山 Han slips have played a decisive role in elucidating the formation of the Sunzi 孫子（Art of War）, and they include what is thought to be a regional variant text common to the Sun family and a school of disciples （“Qi Sunzi”）, consisting of the writings of Sun Wu 孫武, which form the core of the received text of the 13-chapter Sunzi, together with some writings of Sun Bin 孫臏, such as the “Qin Pang Juan” 擒龐涓, “Jian Weiwang” 見威王（provisional title）, “Weiwang wen” 威王問, and “Chen Ji wen lei” 陳忌問塁. It was not the case that Cao Cao created the standard text of the Sunzi by picking out from texts common to the Sun family and a school of disciples such as the “Qi Sunzi” the thirteen chapters considered to have originally been the work of Sun Wu. Instead he created the standard text by collating several texts of the Sunzi that had roughly the same number of characters as the 13-chapter received text and included a text deriving from the Yinqueshan Han slips. When doing so, Cao Cao made the contents of the Sunzi more abstract, deepened their implications, and altered them so that they could be applied to different situations, and it may be supposed that the philosophical character of the Sunzi was enhanced as a result of Cao Cao’s editing of the text. When writing his commentary on the Sunzi, Cao Cao added comments based on Huang-Lao 黄老 thought, which was found in the Sunzi, in order to add depth to the characteristics of its military thought, and in his glosses he interpreted words and phrases in line with the text of the Sunzi. However, there are instances in which he added comments at variance with the arguments of the Sunzi on the basis of his own military experiences. In particular, he endeavoured to explain his military thinking in concrete detail with regard to the two battles in Xuzhou 徐州. However, this was limited to two passages, and on the whole his comments are aligned to the Sunzi, which sets forth theories of military strategy in abstract terms. This was a manifestation of Cao Cao’s military thought, according to which, as is stated in the Sunzi, individual battles are always different because of various conditions such as the character of the region, the terrain, and the behaviour of the other side, and no positive significance can be found in lending specificity to comments on a book about military strategy. Whenever he was engaged in actual warfare, Cao Cao would issue military orders, and he also gave instructions through military orders regarding weapons and types of troops not mentioned in the Sunzi. Furthermore, the Bingshu jieyao 兵書接要, said to have been excerpted from other books on military strategy, records ideas about “military yin and yang,” not included in the Sunzi. Even though he wrote a commentary on the Sunzi, which had broken free from magic and understood warfare in rational terms, Cao Cao, having experienced defeat due to happenstance in the midst of actual fighting, felt that there were limits to the rational character of the Sunzi, in which it is stated that before any engagement the general should determine in the ancestral temple how many factors are in his favour. Cao Cao regarded the Sunzi as the best treatise on military strategy and wrote his commentary in line with its contents, but nonetheless he was well aware of its limitations. For this reason he prepared the Bingshu jieyao, which supplemented the principles of the Sunzi, and also provided military orders that gave instructions for specific tactics, thereby sharing his research on the science of war with his generals and attempting to take unified military action. Herein lies the distinguishing feature of Cao Cao’s military thought. |
|||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 東洋文化研究所紀要 en : The memoirs of Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia 巻 182, p. 25-63, 発行日 2023-01-31 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00170926 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
