WEKO3
アイテム
Is the Buddha just like a demon? Śāntaraksita’s defense of the Buddha’s teaching
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002007563
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002007563c3c2978a-91e2-43f0-9941-5a127aadf0a2
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ioc182004.pdf (1.6 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-06-06 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Is the Buddha just like a demon? Śāntaraksita’s defense of the Buddha’s teaching | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/0002007563 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 |
片岡, 啓
× 片岡, 啓
|
|||||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | 九州大学大学院人文科学研究院 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | In his Tattvasamgraha（TS）, Śāntaraksita, a Buddhist of the eighth century AD, criticizes various theories of other schools of his time. In the final chapter, Chapter 26, he attempts to defend the authority of the Buddha from attacks on omniscience from the Mīmāmsā school. This paper addresses the issues surrounding the two types of preaching discussed in the final chapter. That is, it looks at the problem of the two kinds of preaching: the form in which the Buddha preaches through his mouth as usual, and the supernatural form of preaching in which the Buddha is just there and the preaching flows out from the walls, etc. The criticism of the Buddha from the Mīmāmsā scholar Kumārila on this and the response from Śāntaraksita are analyzed in detail. The main focus of this paper is to elucidate TS 3237-45, the reply of Śāntaraksita, and to trace in detail its correspondence with the criticism from Kumārila. Specifically, we look in detail at the correspondences in three places: Ślokavārttika Codanā 137-140, TS 3237-45 （pūrvapaks3a）, and TS 3592-3620 （uttarapaksa）. This clarifies the compositional intent of the TS verses, which can ultimately be traced back to Kumārila’s Ślokavārttika, and thus clarifies how Śāntaraksita’s arguments are structured and what they answer, including the historical development of the arguments. By presenting the original sources, English translations, compositional framework, and comparative correspondence, the issues and intentions of Kumārila and Śāntaraksita’s exchange of arguments are clarified. Through specific discussions, we are also able to clarify that the comparison of the three places mentioned above is essential for the philological and historical study of the TS. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 東洋文化研究所紀要 en : The memoirs of Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia 巻 182, p. 148(183)-95(236), 発行日 2023-01-31 |
|||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05638089 | |||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00170926 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学東洋文化研究所 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
