WEKO3
アイテム
帰結主義における行為とそれ以外 : その焦点、参照点、レベル
https://doi.org/10.15083/0002007635
https://doi.org/10.15083/00020076358e0cff19-9207-43b3-bc67-5853d7d09a66
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
vol3201.pdf (1.1 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2023-07-11 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 帰結主義における行為とそれ以外 : その焦点、参照点、レベル | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Actions and Nonactions in Consequentialism : Focal Point, Reference Point, and Level | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/0002007635 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 |
髙橋, 礼
× 髙橋, 礼
|
|||||||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院総合文化研究科国際社会科学専攻 | |||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Standard act consequentialism directly evaluates actions. But how can and should, if any, consequentialists evaluate nonaction objects such as rules, motives, and social institutions? Since the mid20th century, much ink has been spent on the validity of indirect consequentialist views, e.g., ruleconsequentialism, motive-consequentialism, and virtue-consequentialism, as alternatives to act consequentialism. Furthermore, global consequentialism, a view that evaluates everything in terms of its consequence, has been gaining popularity in recent decades. This paper concerns how consequentialism can and should assess nonaction objects. One challenge to this inquiry is conceptual and terminological confusion hindering an appropriate treatment of this question. Given this, the purpose of this paper is two-folded. First, I off er a framework that distinguishes three often overlooked concepts: a focal point, a reference point, and a level. Not only is this framework useful for my purpose, but it will also promote a general understanding of the structure of consequentialism. Second, I utilize this framework to examine conceptual spaces of consequentialist views that arise from it. Eliminating all views with at least prima facie diffi culties, I ultimately conclude that, among the conceptually possible views, only two positions survive the scrutiny, viz., act-local direct multilevel consequentialism and act-local indirect multi-level consequentialism. Given this, we must return to the traditional debate between direct and indirect consequentialism. |
|||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | 一般論文 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Papers | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 相関社会科学 = Komaba Studies in Society 巻 32, p. 3-19, 発行日 2022 |
|||||||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10181474 | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学大学院総合文化研究科国際社会科学専攻 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Department of Advanced Social and International Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
