ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 132 東洋文化研究所
  2. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  3. 159
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  4. 159

初期イスラーム神学ムゥタズィラ派研究2 : 『ウラマー・イェ・イスラーム』の写本蒐集と校訂翻訳

https://doi.org/10.15083/00026896
https://doi.org/10.15083/00026896
627d7af1-5c41-41a1-bfcf-214d5b85253b
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ioc159003.pdf ioc159003.pdf (2.6 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2013-01-11
タイトル
タイトル 初期イスラーム神学ムゥタズィラ派研究2 : 『ウラマー・イェ・イスラーム』の写本蒐集と校訂翻訳
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00026896
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル A Study on Zurvanite Zoroastrianism 2 : Collecting and Editing MSS of 'Ulamā-ya Islām and its Comparison with early Islamic Mu'tazilite Theology
著者 青木, 健

× 青木, 健

WEKO 59236

青木, 健

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 59237
姓名 AOKI, Takeshi
著者所属
著者所属 慶応義塾大学言語文化研究所
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 This paper is the sequel to "A Study on Zurvanite Zoroastrianism 1 : Collecting and Editing MSS of ‘Ulamā-ye Islām and its Comparison with Manichaeism and Dualistic Zoroastrianism," The Memoirs of Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, No. 158, pp. 166(115)~78(203), 2010. In that paper I edited a Persian treatise ‘Ulamā-ye Islām as the only surviving work from Zurvanite point of view. But this same title has another version dealing with not Zurvanite thought in the fifth century, but a refutation against early Islamic theology Mu'tazilite from Zoroastrian point of view. Although the Persian text is published in lithograph in 1922, no critical editions exist thus far. To address this situation, I have collected independent MSS of that treatise both already known in Mumbai (3) and Navsari (1) and unknown in Tehran (2) and Hyderabad (1), then papered the stemma codicum of this another version of ‘Ulamā-ye Islām too and established an Urtext that could account for the variants.// This Urtext reveals some unknown aspects of early history of Islamic theology from Zoroastrian criticism against a concept of Shayy of Mu'tazilite. It must be noted that the origin of the concept Māhīyah (essence) has been debated at the context of Islamic philosophy and some scholar supposed early Mu'tazilite theologians first introduced Shayy as the meaning of essence and this may be the origin of Māhīyah of Ibn Sīnā (d. 1037) without any textual evidence. But now this another version of ‘Ulamā-ye Islām unexpectedly proves that early Mu'tazilite theologians used this term as the meaning of essence, we can safely conclude that direct origin of Māhīyah is not ancient Greek philosophy but early Mu'tazilite theology.
書誌情報 東洋文化研究所紀要

巻 159, p. 66-112, 発行日 2011-03-28
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 05638089
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00170926
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 129.7
出版者
出版者 東京大学東洋文化研究所
出版者別名
Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:50:38.955643
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3