WEKO3
アイテム
勝田・梅根論争における留岡清男と生活綴方 : 戦後日本生活教育問題史〔I〕
https://doi.org/10.15083/00031594
https://doi.org/10.15083/00031594cf246e24-3bc4-41ab-9e9b-b20b82edb10c
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
KJ00002401027.pdf (1.0 MB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-01-13 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 勝田・梅根論争における留岡清男と生活綴方 : 戦後日本生活教育問題史〔I〕 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00031594 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
その他のタイトル | ||||||
その他のタイトル | Kiyoo Tomeoka and Seikatsu-Tsuzurikata in the Controversy between Shuichi Katsuta and Satoru Umene : A History of Problems on Seikatsu-Kyoiku in Japan After W. W. II 〔I〕 | |||||
著者 |
金馬, 国晴
× 金馬, 国晴 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
識別子 | 69931 | |||||
姓名 | Kimma, Kuniharu | |||||
著者所属 | ||||||
値 | 教育学コース | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The controversy between Shuichi Katsuta and Satoru Umene took place in 1952,facing a crisis of dividing of social studies. At that time, Katsuta was the leader of the Kyokaken (the Conference-group of Educational Science), and Umene was the vice-chairman of the Koaren (Core-Curriculum League). After the controversy, Kyokaken has come to acquire greater influence over educational circles than the Koaren. Examining the following two points, in this paper, I try to read out a problem over the theory of Seikatsu-Kyoiku (Education for Life) in Japan after W. W. II, from the controversy. First, Umene insisted that his theory about social studies has developed from Shakai-Kenkyuka (Social Research Subject)-the idea shaped by Kiyoo Toneoka. However, no one has pointed out the connection between the two, though they argued about the same educational theory. Secondly, Tomeoka proposed Shakai-Kenkyu-ka, when he criticized Seikatsu-Tsuzurikata. Later, both Katsuta and Umene evaluated Yamabiko-Gakko or Seikatsu-Tsuzurikata. I try to examine those evaluation and criticism, comparing their characteristic of Seikatsu-Kyoiku. After of all, I want to define what was the problem on the theory of Seikatsu-Kyoiku before and after the W. W. II. | |||||
書誌情報 |
東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 巻 38, p. 53-61, 発行日 1998-03-26 |
|||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 13421050 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AN10516641 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
主題 | 370 | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
主題 | 371.5 | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
主題 | 375.3 | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
主題 | 375.86 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 東京大学大学院教育学研究科 | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
値 | The Graduate School of Education, University of Tokyo |