WEKO3
アイテム
<個人論文>米国オバマ政権「頂点への競争―早期学習チャレンジ（RTT-ELC）」政策の分析
https://doi.org/10.15083/00031737
https://doi.org/10.15083/00031737b91ee2a3-9197-42f3-aa20-66d6437f3e2f
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
eac033003.pdf (2.9 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2014-05-15 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | <個人論文>米国オバマ政権「頂点への競争―早期学習チャレンジ（RTT-ELC）」政策の分析 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00031737 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | <Individual Papers>An Analysis of "the Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge" Policy under the Obama Administration in the U.S. | |||||
| 著者 |
平沢, 絵理
× 平沢, 絵理 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 70277 | |||||
| 姓名 | Hirasawa, Eri | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper aims to clarify the objectives and means of “the Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC)” policy under the Obama Administration in the U.S., and to find out what kinds of states received RTT-ELC grants. The findings in this research are as follows. First, the objectives of RTT-ELC are to improve the quality of early learning and development and to close the achievement gap for children with high needs. In other words, RTT-ELC supports states that build or try to build a statewide system that raises the quality of early learning and development programs so that all children receive the support they need to enter kindergarten ready to succeed. Second, as I expected, states which have economic or educational capacity received RTT-ELC grants while states which have little capacity did not. Then, I compared the early learning and development system of Kansas, which failed to get an RTT-ELC grant but whose elementary school students have a high score on the achievement test, with that of Massachusetts, which got an RTT-ELC grant, in order to clarify some other problems of the RTT-ELC competition. As a result, I point out the problem that Kansas, which carried out a unique, but seemingly sufficient policy without following the framework suggested by the federal government, was not able to receive the grant. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
東京大学大学院教育学研究科教育行政学論叢 = The journal of Educational Administration Graduate School of Education, the University of Tokyo 巻 33, p. 31-52, 発行日 2013-10 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13421980 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA1220520X | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学大学院教育学研究科学校開発政策コース | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Department of School Improvement and Educational Policy Studies, Graduate School of Education The University of Tokyo | ||||||
