WEKO3
アイテム
『カターヴァットゥ』の論理
https://doi.org/10.15083/00037028
https://doi.org/10.15083/000370289d345507-58d4-430a-ac1c-f0c7a687c6bc
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
ib010001.pdf (1.1 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-06-30 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 『カターヴァットゥ』の論理 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00037028 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | The Logic of the Kathāvatthu | |||||
| 著者 |
清水, 元広
× 清水, 元広 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 136127 | |||||
| 姓名 | Shimizu, Motohiro | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The Kathāvatthu (Kv.) is one of the seven works which make up the Abhidhamma-piţaka, and it is the work dealing with debate which begins with questions and answers. Its logicalness has hitherto attracted scholars'attention for the reason that it has formal consistency in its lines of argument. In considering especially the logic (not the science but the laws of thought for constructing argument forms) of the Kv., this paper focusses on the contrasting contents of the studies by St. Schayer and J (1). M. Bocheński. First, a basic line of argument is considered. Here the following facts are shown: (i) the part named anuloma-pañcaka is the most fundamental regarding form; and (ii) it is difficult to discover logical significance in most of the basic lines of argument because many parts can be said to be redundant and do not seem to be arranged with logical necessity. Next, the focal point is to consider the logic of the anuloma-pañcaka. According to S. Z. Aung, the way of thinking which is in accord with the mixed hypothetical syllogism denying the consequent (modus tollendo tollens) is found in the anuloma-pañcaka. Schayer points out that two laws of propositional logic (the definition of implication and the law of contraposition) exist in the same part, and this makes the logic of the Kv. correspond to the logic seen in the studies of the Stoics of ancient Greece. Schayer, however, does not accept Aung's analysis using terminal variables, and maintains that propositional variables should be used, considering the logic of the Kv. to be formalized per proposition. Bocheński, on the contrary, in accordance with his view that the logic of the Kv. is formalized per term, asserts that terminal variables should be used, and that the logic of the Kv. is correspondent to that of dialectics in the pre-Aristotelian period of ancient Greece. The present writer judges Bocheński's opinion to be correct about the placing of the logic of the Kv. in the developmental stages of Greek logic. It is not, however, the case that, following his assertion, the above correspondence is accepted within the framework of terminal logic. The acceptance is based on various similarities, one of which is that both the Kv. and the dialectics of the pre-Aristotelian period treat of the logical relationship between propositions. On the other hand, the present writer supports Schayer regarding his interpretation of the logic of the Kv., and considers it to be formalized per proposition. The main reasons are as follows: (i) cases with no fixed subject are often found in the Kv.; (ii) the quantity of the hypothetical proposition is not made into a problem; (iii) truth or falsity is predicated not of terms but of propositions; and (iv) the logical relationship is between propositions and not terms. Therefore, it can be said that a method of argument conforming to the laws of propositional logic is being used in the Kv.. However, based on several facts, this paper judges that the science of propositional logic did not exist in the period when the Kv. was composed, just as it did not exist in the pre-Aristotelian period of ancient Greece. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
インド哲学仏教学研究 巻 10, p. 3-16, 発行日 2003-03-20 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09197907 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10419736 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 126 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科・文学部インド哲学仏教学研究室 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Department of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, University of Tokyo | ||||||
