WEKO3
アイテム
A Parametric Syntax Approach to the Emergence of Non-Agreeing Possessive Appositives in the History of English
https://doi.org/10.15083/00039167
https://doi.org/10.15083/00039167a155589f-4c04-4801-94c0-708a4b6fac73
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
Kondo_2008_LR.pdf (154.7 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2009-06-23 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | A Parametric Syntax Approach to the Emergence of Non-Agreeing Possessive Appositives in the History of English | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Split Genitive | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Non-Agreeing Possessive Appositive (NAPA) | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | agreement in DP | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | formal/semantic features | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | feature classification parameter | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.15083/00039167 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
著者 |
Kondo, Norihiko
× Kondo, Norihiko |
|||||
著者所属 | ||||||
値 | The University of Tokyo | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | In this paper I take up two appositive constructions observed in the history of English, namely, Split Genitive and Non-Agreeing Possessive Appositive (NAPA), and offer an explanation for the emergence of NAPA in the Early ME period (EME). In Split Genitive, both parts of the appositive carry genitive case, while in NAPA only the first part of it does, its second part having no inflection. Lightfoot (1999), for example, gives an account of this fact in terms of the loss of morphological case and the reanalysis of genitive case as a clitic. Allen (2002), on the other hand, accounts for it by associating a principle of Morphological Blocking with an agreement in DP. Certainly, these two analyses are valid for explaining this case, but they cannot unify it with the other diachronic changes discussed in Watanabe (forthcoming) which took place almost simultaneously in the transition form OE to ME. Considering these drawbacks of the two previous analyses, then, I provide an alternative explanation for it in terms of the feature classification parameter proposed by Watanabe. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Articles | |||||
書誌情報 |
Linguistic research : working papers in English linguistics 巻 24, p. 29-37, 発行日 2008-07 |
|||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
収録物識別子 | AA10462609 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
主題 | 930 | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | Tokyo University English Linguistics Association | |||||
出版者別名 | ||||||
値 | 東京大学英語学研究会 |