WEKO3
アイテム
Two Types of Relative Clauses in Germanic and Romance Languages
https://doi.org/10.15083/00039175
https://doi.org/10.15083/000391757b5dd793-80b4-4a0f-b524-2c8e7f5b7783
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
lr022002.pdf (2.7 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2008-10-14 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Two Types of Relative Clauses in Germanic and Romance Languages | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | (Infinitival) Relative Clause | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Wh-pronoun | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | D-pronoun | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Null-operator | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.15083/00039175 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
Inada, Shun'ichiro
× Inada, Shun'ichiro |
|||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | University of Tokyo | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper makes clear an important distinction in relative clauses in Germanic and Romance languages based on morphological forms of relative pronouns and structural positions of relative clauses within DP. I claim that there are two types of relative clauses : (i) a relative clause which allows an overt relative pronoun only when it is accompanied by a pied-piped preposition ; and (ii) a relative clause with an overt relative pronoun, allowing larger constituents to be pied-piped. In the second type of the relative clause only a d-pronoun or a complex pronoun with the form of a determiner and a wh-word is used. Under this typology of relative clauses, two points are shown. The first is that English infinitival relatives, which do not allow an occurrence of an overt relative pronoun without a pied-piped preposition, constitute the first type of relative clauses. The second is that English finite relatives are peculiar from a cross-linguistic perspective. Only a d-pronoun or a complex pronoun can be bare in Germanic and Romance languages whereas in English, a wh-pronoun can be ""bare"" (i.e. without pied-piped constituents). Concerning the peculiarity of English wh-pronouns, investigation of a historical change of relative clauses in English suggests the reason why they have such a property. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
Linguistic research : working papers in English linguistics 巻 22, p. 29-56, 発行日 2006-06 |
|||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA10462609 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 930 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | Tokyo University English Linguistics Association | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| 東京大学英語学研究会 | ||||||
