WEKO3
アイテム
<生きている>ことの了解と自己性 : <生>の意味に関する現象学的解釈
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/36999
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/369993cb951d4-a14b-4974-bc5b-2eb5c15a3268
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
da012005.pdf (1.4 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2010-08-06 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | <生きている>ことの了解と自己性 : <生>の意味に関する現象学的解釈 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | An Inquiry into the Life of the Human and of the Animal fom the Viwpoint of Phenomenology. | |||||
| 著者 |
吉田, 聡
× 吉田, 聡 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 95221 | |||||
| 姓名 | Yoshida, Akira | |||||
| 著者所属 | ||||||
| 著者所属 | 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科 | |||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | What life is seems to be obvious. We can state that we live, of course, when we act or recognize something. In the case of animals, we can also state that they live when we observe certain behaviors in them. However, what living itself means is obscure. In this paper I would like to clarifY the meaning of living itself by considering the way in which we comprehend living beings. It is not my purpose in this paper to find what kinds of biological features living beings generally have. When we consider such a problem, we already presuppose what living is. Rather, I hope to make clear how we understand living itself.<改行> For this purpose it is instructive to refer to the phenomenological analysis of Husserl and Heidegger. I examine their arguments about the way we comprehend living beings. In particular, I examine Husserl's view on comprehending the animal in Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology and Heidegger's argument in The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitttde, Solitude. According to Husserl, we comprehend the animal as "an anomalous modification" of the hmnan. In his view, the way we comprehend animals is analogous to the way we comprehend humans. However, we can also find an essential difference between the meaning of animal and the meaning of hi/man if we distinguish them. Unlike Husserl, Heidegger draws attention to this difference. We grasp human and animal as that which is clearly distinguished from mere inanimate things like stones. Httman and animal have this in common. However, Heidegger claims that animals are always carried away by something, and that they cannot grasp a thing as a thing. He emphasizes that the circumstances that surround the animal are not the same as the world that surrounds the human. According to this argument, animals do not have the world and the selfness that we have. This is what Heidegger finds to be the essential difference between the animal and the human.<改行> Based on comparing Husserl's and Heidegger's arguments, we can understand the following. On the one hand, animal is comprehended as a modification of httman, which seems to have a world and selfness. On the other hand, animal is comprehended as that which does nOt have a world and selfness. I disclose this double characteristic of our way of comprehending the animal, and clarify the characteristic of selfness that the human has. Through the above arguments, I try to clarify our way ofcomprehending the life of the human and of the animal. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
死生学研究 巻 12, p. 94-124, 発行日 2009-10-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 18826024 | |||||
| ISBN | ||||||
| 識別子タイプ | ISBN | |||||
| 関連識別子 | 9784925210157 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA11838867 | |||||
| 日本十進分類法 | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
| 主題 | 105 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 東京大学グローバルCOEプログラム「死生学の展開と組織化」 | |||||
| 出版者別名 | ||||||
| Development and Systematization of Death and Life Studies | ||||||
