WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "5738cbd1-c8d9-4bb7-a3e1-31e952994b26"}, "_deposit": {"id": "43063", "owners": [], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "43063"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp:00043063", "sets": ["7447", "7448"]}, "item_11_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2000", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographic_titles": [{}]}]}, "item_11_description_13": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_11_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "An automatic term extraction system consists of a term candidate extraction subsystem, a ranking subsystem and a selection subsystem. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate two ranking methods and two selection methods. As for ranking, a dichotomy of unithood and termhood is a key notion. We evaluate these two notions experimentally by comparing Imp based ranking method that is based directly on termhood and C-value based method that is indirectly based on both termhood and unithood. As for selection, we compare the simple threshold method with the window method that we propose. We did the experimental evaluation with several Japanese technical manuals. The result does not show much difference in recall and precision. The small difference between the extracted terms by these two ranking methods depends upon their ranking mechanism per se.", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_11_full_name_3": {"attribute_name": "著者別名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "99023", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "Nakagawa, Hiroshi"}]}]}, "item_11_publisher_20": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "John Benjamins Publishing Company"}]}, "item_11_relation_9": {"attribute_name": "ISBN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_relation_type": "isIdenticalTo", "subitem_relation_type_id": {"subitem_relation_type_id_text": "9027249849", "subitem_relation_type_select": "ISBN"}}]}, "item_11_subject_15": {"attribute_name": "日本十進分類法", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "801", "subitem_subject_scheme": "NDC"}]}, "item_11_text_34": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "Book chapter"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "中川, 裕志"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "99022", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2017-06-16"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "NAK.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "186.8 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 186800.0, "url": {"label": "NAK.pdf", "url": "https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/43063/files/NAK.pdf"}, "version_id": "289890f6-da42-4707-97dc-40cc5e7b3f6c"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "automatic term extraction system", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Computational Terminology", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Japanese language", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "book", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33"}]}, "item_title": "Experimental Evaluation of Ranking and Selection Methods in Term Extraction", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Experimental Evaluation of Ranking and Selection Methods in Term Extraction"}]}, "item_type_id": "11", "owner": "1", "path": ["7447", "7448"], "permalink_uri": "http://hdl.handle.net/2261/31", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2012-01-05"}, "publish_date": "2012-01-05", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "43063", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["Experimental Evaluation of Ranking and Selection Methods in Term Extraction"], "weko_shared_id": null}
Experimental Evaluation of Ranking and Selection Methods in Term Extraction
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/31
http://hdl.handle.net/2261/312afee0ae-0eec-4c47-91ee-b45a2f6070fa
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
NAK.pdf (186.8 kB)
|
|
Item type | 図書 / Book(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2012-01-05 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Experimental Evaluation of Ranking and Selection Methods in Term Extraction | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題 | automatic term extraction system | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題 | Computational Terminology | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題 | Japanese language | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33 | |||||
タイプ | book | |||||
著者 |
中川, 裕志
× 中川, 裕志 |
|||||
著者別名 | ||||||
識別子 | 99023 | |||||
識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
姓名 | Nakagawa, Hiroshi | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | An automatic term extraction system consists of a term candidate extraction subsystem, a ranking subsystem and a selection subsystem. In this paper, we experimentally evaluate two ranking methods and two selection methods. As for ranking, a dichotomy of unithood and termhood is a key notion. We evaluate these two notions experimentally by comparing Imp based ranking method that is based directly on termhood and C-value based method that is indirectly based on both termhood and unithood. As for selection, we compare the simple threshold method with the window method that we propose. We did the experimental evaluation with several Japanese technical manuals. The result does not show much difference in recall and precision. The small difference between the extracted terms by these two ranking methods depends upon their ranking mechanism per se. | |||||
書誌情報 | 発行日 2000 | |||||
ISBN | ||||||
関連タイプ | isIdenticalTo | |||||
識別子タイプ | ISBN | |||||
関連識別子 | 9027249849 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
日本十進分類法 | ||||||
主題 | 801 | |||||
主題Scheme | NDC | |||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | John Benjamins Publishing Company |