ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 132 東洋文化研究所
  2. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  3. 173
  1. 0 資料タイプ別
  2. 30 紀要・部局刊行物
  3. 東洋文化研究所紀要
  4. 173

文明・文化言説と国民帝国・中華帝国・日本帝国 : 台湾・朝鮮の植民政策研究の理論的前進のために(2)

https://doi.org/10.15083/00074430
https://doi.org/10.15083/00074430
58dbadec-39fe-4407-ab8a-7c354206307d
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
ioc173003.pdf ioc173003.pdf (937.4 kB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2018-04-17
タイトル
タイトル 文明・文化言説と国民帝国・中華帝国・日本帝国 : 台湾・朝鮮の植民政策研究の理論的前進のために(2)
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
タイプ departmental bulletin paper
ID登録
ID登録 10.15083/00074430
ID登録タイプ JaLC
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Discourses of Civilization and Culture in the Co-Construction of the Nation-State, Chinese, and Japanese Empires : Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Colonial Policy in Taiwan and Korea(2)
著者 山内, 文登

× 山内, 文登

WEKO 146293

山内, 文登

Search repository
著者別名
識別子Scheme WEKO
識別子 146294
姓名 Yamauchi, Fumitaka
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Historical writings on China have long been constrained by a seemingly indisputable rupture between the periods of the Qing dynasty and the Chinese republic: Qing is examined as an empire, whether a regional despotic empire or, as in recent revisionist views, a colonial empire that is contemporaneous and compatible with its Western counterparts in global history; the Republic of China, meanwhile, particularly that after the consolidation of power by the Nationalist Government in the late 1920s, is studied exclusively through the nation-state framework. During the late nineteenth century, however, the Manchu dynasty, which had stretched far away into the non-sinographic terrains of Inner Asia, redefined itself in sinographic terms as zhongguo or the one and only Middle-Kingdom while refusing to be just another empire in the world; it was only after its defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War that the Qing court for the first time adopted the Japanese translation of empire diguo (Jp. teikoku), coupled with wenming (Jp. bunmei) or civilization, into the official lexicon. The dominant historiography, then, has left unquestioned the paradigmatic gap between zhongguo and diguo as well as the two ideas’ hegemonic struggle, which has lingered on in post-revolutionary Chinese discourse; furthermore, it hastily equates accomplishments of revolution with assertions of de-imperialization without attending to the more nuanced relationship between imperialism and nationalism in that same discourse.
The present paper, which is the latter half of Chapter 2 in this serial article, re-interrogates the transition between the dynastic and republican regimes as the specific formation of a nation-empire, namely, the imperial formation characteristic of the age of the nation-state, as was explored in the first installment. Central to the analysis is the proposition that in that process the translated notions of civilization and culture were re-signified in the sinographic semantic field in a way that eventually articulated the discourse of anti-imperial culturalism. It is this discourse that enabled the new republic to authenticate itself as a legitimate victim of empire, whether as a semi-colony (ban zhimindi) or an even lower-ranked hypo-colony (ci zhimindi), in both cases thereby effectively denying and defying its deeply internalized imperiality. In order to trace the highly complicated process of this discursive formation over the course of a century, this installment is divided into three sections, on the late nineteenth century, the turn of the twentieth century, and the early republican era, respectively. The argument demonstrates that in each period the semantic equivalence in translation between jiaohua and civilization, jinhua and evolution, and wenhua and culture was foregrounded but re-signified by way of a sinographic play on signifiers; this re-signification, moreover, granted tonghua or assimilation positive value in dominant discourse. Hence the nascent nationempire was enabled to represent itself as a nation-state embracing the entirety of its subjects in the Chinese nation (zhonghua minzu), while undermining the idea of culture as a principle of difference and autonomy. The materials this text considers, among others, are late Qing policies towards Taiwan and Korea, Liang Qichao’s adaptation of “national imperialism” (minzu diguozhuyi), and Sun Yatsen’s advocacy of “royal-way culture” (wangdao wenhua).
The concurrent formation of an empire that is mediated by the suppression of its very imperial self in culturalist terms strongly affected the workings and legitimacy of the Japanese empire and its colonial policies towards Taiwan and Korea. This study reexamines East Asian history in terms of the antagonistic but complicit ergence of regional empires so as to articulate a fresh critique of inter-imperial global modernity.
書誌情報 東洋文化研究所紀要 = The memoirs of Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia

巻 173, p. 71-158, 発行日 2018-03
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 05638089
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00170926
著者版フラグ
値 publisher
出版者
出版者 東京大学東洋文化研究所
出版者別名
Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia, The University of Tokyo
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2021-03-01 11:54:45.485246
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3